The Re-Recording Era
Table of Contents
Ownership Is Key
Taylor's Worst Nightmare
The Reason to Rerecord
Taylor’s hope was to override those archival works with these new versions. “Artists should own their own work for so many reasons,” she wrote in a March 2021 Instagram post. “But the most screamingly obvious one is that the artist is the only one who really knows that body of work.” Her choice stirred up responses across the music world, and forced the public to take a long look at the music industry’s quiet corporate machinations.
Artists regularly chafe against their record label contracts. But rarely do they go through the hassle of re-recording and re-releasing old work. Taylor, though, is not the usual artist. She had time—a whole year of it, while the pandemic put her touring schedule on pause. And she is meticulous about how her work is consumed and perceived, from the aesthetics of her album covers to the comments she makes on fan blogs. Given her unique position, platforms like Spotify had everything to gain by supporting her new versions. Meanwhile, the fans who are the most active streamers of her old music had become well aware of her intentions — and abided by her wishes. Taylor was in the rare position to want to upend the system and actually have the power to do so.
The New Original Version
Taylor’s re-recordings are faithful to their original versions—with some subtle production updates, and the newfound maturity in her voice that an extra decade provided. Taylor was also sharing a number of new tracks from what she called her “vault,” starting with “You All Over Me” with Maren Morris, out March 25, 2021.
What’s truly different about Taylor’s “new” work is the intention behind it, and developments that had brought her to the place to own it. Every musician is a business, a startup with limited equity to portion out to labels, publishers and other stakeholders. As the business grows, the musician is left with a smaller and smaller piece of that pie. Greater equity was the central consideration of Taylor’s label change—along with greater certainty that all who contributed to making the art itself would benefit from their work. “There was one condition that meant more to me than any other deal point,” she wrote at the time: ensuring that profits from the future sale of Spotify shares would be returned to artists. That this financial nitty-gritty was what excited Taylor most might have seemed at odds with her image as a singer-songwriter who performed on sets that looked like a cottage in a fairy-tale forest. But that persona hid Taylors’ savvy: she had long understood that artists, even those with brands as powerful as hers, are vulnerable to exploitation. After building an empire writing deeply personal songs, should selling her story really come so cheap?